FITCH UPGRADES OVERTON POWER DIST. NO. 5

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

FITCH UPGRADES OVERTON POWER DIST. NO. 5,

NV’S REVS TO ‘A-‘; OUTLOOK REVISED TO STABLE

 

Fitch Ratings-San Francisco-12 January 2017: Fitch Ratings has upgraded its rating on Overton Power District No. 5, Nevada’s (OPD5) implied revenue bonds to ‘A-‘ from ‘BBB+’.

 

OPD5’s rating takes into account approximately $48.5 million of secured debt privately held by National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corp., but is assigned to implied obligations given that none of the outstanding debt is publically held.

 

The Rating Outlook is revised to Stable from Positive.

 

SECURITY

 

The district’s obligations are payable from the electric system’s net revenues.

 

KEY RATING DRIVERS

 

RELATIVELY SMALL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: OPD5 is a relatively small distribution

system serving a largely residential customer base of approximately 14,800 in a rural service area northeast of Las Vegas. The utility’s rate base is moderately concentrated with the top 10 customers accounting for approximately 21.3% of operating revenues in 2015.

 

POWER SUPPLY SECURED: The district’s new power supply contract with Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. took effect in June 2016 and extends to the end of 2024. The medium-term contract extends beyond the district’s normal five-year agreements, and provides a lower cost of power compared with the previous arrangement.

 

IMPROVING FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: The upgrade reflects Fitch’s expectation that financial performance will materially improve as power costs are reduced under the new power supply contract. Projected debt service coverage from 2016-2020 is approximately 1.8x after adjusting for the revenue loss from an expected decrease in commercial rates.

 

SOUND LIQUIDITY: The district’s adequate cash levels are expected to increase to approximately 130 days cash on hand in 2016 from 100 days in 2015 as higher financial margins improve the district’s bottom line. Liquidity levels are further strengthened by a $5 million line of credit with CFC.

 

STABILIZING SERVICE TERRITORY: The district’s service territory was significantly affected by the recession, and its recovery has lagged the nation and surrounding metro areas. However, local conditions appear to have stabilized with a growing customer base, modest MWh sales growth, and on-going development in the area.

 

SIGNIFICANT FUTURE DEBT PLANS: The district’s future debt plans are significant with a tentatively planned $80 million issuance by 2022 to finance a cost-saving transmission project. Debt metrics would likely increase to well above the median for the ‘A’ rating category following the issuance.

 

RATING SENSITIVITIES

 

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: Financial performance from Overton Power District No. 5 that is materially weaker than current projections, which reflect debt service coverage of approximately 1.8x and over 100 days cash on hand, could lead to negative rating action.

 

FUTURE LEVERAGE: The significant increase in leverage expected by 2022 could also negatively pressure the rating if not offset by improved financial performance, which is expected to occur as a new transmission line funded with the proceeds should reduce power supply and transmission costs.

 

CREDIT PROFILE

 

OPD5 is located approximately 65 miles northeast of Las Vegas and provides electric service to a largely residential customer base of 14,763 (2015). OPD5’s exclusive service territory is largely rural but includes the city of Mesquite, NV with an estimated population of approximately 18,000, which has been the focal point for most of OPD5’s customer growth.

 

The local economy has generally stabilized after a slow recovery that lagged the nation and nearby metro areas. This improvement is apparent in the significantly higher customer growth rates over the past four years, which had slowed during and directly after the recession. In addition, the district’s annual MWh sales increased in both 2015 and 2014 by 1.6% and 0.7%, respectively, following five consecutive years of decline.

 

OPD5’s rate base is moderately concentrated with its top 10 customers accounting for approximately 21.3% of operating revenues in 2015.

 

MEDIUM-TERM POWER SUPPLY CONTRACT

 

The district secured a cost-effective power supply contract with Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc. that runs from June 2016 through the end of 2024. The new agreement replaced the preexisting agreement that was set to expire at the end of 2017.

 

IMPROVED FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

 

The district’s financial performance is expected to improve significantly beginning in 2016 as the lower cost of power results in improved margins and higher debt service coverage. Based on actuals through November and management’s projections for December, the district’s debt service coverage ratio in 2016 is projected at 1.85x. Improved cash flow is expected to increase cash reserves with a total ending balance of approximately $10.5 million or 130 days of projected expenses, up from $8.5 million or 100 days cash at the end of 2015.

 

The improvement is notable given the district’s financial performance over the past five years. Audited financial results were largely stable but below levels commensurate with an ‘A’ category rating from 2013 through 2015. Fitch calculated debt service coverage and coverage of full obligations averaged 1.38x and 1.15x, respectively, during the period.

 

Management’s financial forecast through 2021 shows financial metrics generally consistent with the projected performance in 2016. Coverage levels remain close to 1.8x, assuming a modest decrease in commercial rates, and cash on hand exceeds 100 days through the forecast period. Projections include an assumed 1% annual increase in MWh sales.

 

Contact:

 

Primary Analyst

Matthew Reilly, CFA

Director

+1-415-732-7572

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

650 California St, 4th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94108

 

Secondary Analyst

Jeremy Williams

Analyst

+1-646-582-4870

Committee Chairperson

Dennis Pidherny

Managing Director

+1-212-908-0738

 

 

 

 

 

Media Relations: Elizabeth Fogerty, New York, Tel: +1 (212) 908 0526, Email:

elizabeth.fogerty@fitchratings.com.

 

Additional information is available at ‘www.fitchratings.com’.

 

Applicable Criteria

Revenue-Supported Rating Criteria (pub. 16 Jun 2014) https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/750012

U.S. Public Power Rating Criteria (pub. 18 May 2015) https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/864007

 

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY’S PUBLIC WEB

SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH’S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.

Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.

The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities.

Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.

For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Comments

  1. Joey mochealli says:

    Too bad there service sucks.
    What is the intension of this news story?
    Junk company – junk bonds-lol
    The many power outages and rickety opd power structure are a joke.
    The top brass are paid too much.
    Cannot wait till they get bought out or kicked out- worse utility ever

Speak Your Mind

*