Hardy statement on Administration’s Greater Sage Grouse protection plans

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Congressman Cresent Hardy (NV-04) today issued the following statement regarding the Obama Administration’s announcement of federal land use plans for the Greater Sage Grouse:

“These restrictive plans may be well-intended, but they are coming from the wrong direction. Leave conservation efforts to local people who know and use the land best, not Washington bureaucrats who have no idea what it’s like to live and work with our state’s natural resources below ground and the magnificent species above ground.

“Nevada’s efforts work – as evidenced by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s clear decision earlier this year to not list the Bi-State Sage Grouse found in limited areas of our state.

“If we are to preserve the Greater Sage Grouse without curtailing local economic progress, Washington should stop telling us what to do with our land and leave it to the states.”
Info from BLM:

BLM, USFS Plans for Public Lands in Nevada and Northeastern California Provide for Greater Sage-Grouse Protection, Balanced Development

Reno – Today the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) released final environmental reviews for land use plans in Nevada and Northeastern California that will help to conserve Greater Sage-Grouse habitat and support sustainable economic development. The land management plans, developed during the past three years in partnership with the states and with input from local partners, will benefit wildlife, outdoor recreation, ranching and other traditional land uses that rely on a healthy sagebrush landscape.

The updated Nevada and Northeastern California plan is an essential element of an unprecedented and proactive strategy to respond to the deteriorating health of the American West’s sagebrush landscapes and declining population of the greater sage-grouse, a ground-dwelling bird under consideration by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for protection under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).

The collaborative federal-state effort includes three key elements to conserve the sagebrush landscape, which faces threats from fire, invasive species and encroaching development: a comprehensive strategy to fight rangeland fire, strong conservation plans for federal public lands, and conservation actions on state and private lands.

“The West is rapidly changing – with increasingly intense wildfires, invasive species and development altering the sagebrush landscape and threatening wildlife, ranching and our outdoor heritage,” said Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell. “As land managers of two-thirds of greater sage-grouse habitat, we have a responsibility to take action that ensures a bright future for wildlife and a thriving western economy. Together with conservation efforts from states and private landowners, we are laying an important foundation to save the disappearing sagebrush landscape of the American West.”

“Federal and state governments and private landowners recognize that a healthy sagebrush landscape means a healthy western economy,” said Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack. “We are working with local partners to design innovative, long-term conservation plans. Together, we can put effective conservation measures in place that not only benefit the greater sage-grouse, but also preserve the western way of life, help improve grazing lands and bolster rural economies.”

The final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will guide land management on approximately 17 million acres of BLM and Forest Service-administered surface land primarily in Nevada.  The final EIS is the result of a robust, multi-year public process, including public scoping sessions, public meetings and public comment periods on the draft EIS.  The plans are now undergoing a 60-day Governor’s Consistency Review period and concurrent 30-day protest period, after which Records of Decisions will be signed.

The plans address issues identified by the Service in a 2010 determination that found the greater sage-grouse was deserving of protection under the ESA due to the inadequacy of regulatory protections to prevent further sagebrush habitat fragmentation, placing the bird in danger of extinction. Federal protection was deferred because of higher priorities; however, the Service is required to revisit the determination by September 30, 2015.

With the shared goal of taking actions to avoid the need to list the bird, in 2011, then-Secretary Ken Salazar and western governors, led by Wyoming Governor Matt Mead and Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper, formed the Sage-Grouse Task Force to develop a cooperative approach to conserving the species across the West.

The plans provide a layered management approach that offers the highest level of protection in the most valuable habitat, known as Priority Habitat Management Areas. Within priority habitat, the plans seek to limit or eliminate new surface disturbance, particularly in Sagebrush Focal Areas, identified by the Service as “stronghold” areas essential for the species’ survival. The plans seek to minimize disturbance in General Habitat Management Areas, which are lands that require some special management to sustain greater sage-grouse populations, but are not considered as important as priority habitat.

In Nevada and Northeastern California, the plans identify about 6.5 million acres as general habitat and about 10.3 million acres as priority habitat. Within priority habitat, about 2.9 million acres have been identified as Sagebrush Focal Areas.

The Nevada-California plan has a three-tiered habitat approach, which includes “Other Habitat Management Areas” (OHMA) in addition to Priority and General Habitat Management Areas. Lands within OHMA do not have any new allocation decisions or planning decisions associated with them; however, required design features will be adhered to at the project scale.  The Nevada-California plan identifies 6,498,000 acres of OHMA.

The Nevada portion of the plan provides an opportunity to use the State of Nevada’s Conservation Credit System for offsite mitigation, as well as use of the Nevada disturbance cap protocol.  This means that a given project may not disturb more than 3% of sage grouse habitat within the project area and within the biologically significant unit, unless the project will result in a net conservation gain. This exception to the disturbance cap is unique to Nevada.

The Nevada and California planning areas comprise approximately 15.8 percent of the total sage-grouse habitat range-wide.

“We will continue to work with our state and local partners with the shared goal of establishing strong science-based management and conservation commitments across the range of the bird that allow the Fish and Wildlife Service to conclude the protections of the Endangered Species Act are not needed for the greater sage-grouse,” said acting BLM Nevada State Director John Ruhs .

Importantly, the plans honor all valid, existing rights, including those for oil and gas development, renewable energy, rights-of-way, locatable minerals, and other permitted projects. The plan measures only apply to BLM and USFS-managed lands and minerals.

Over the last four years, USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and its partners in the Sage-Grouse Initiative have worked with more than 1,100 private landowners to restore 4.4 million acres of habitat for sage-grouse while maintaining working landscapes.

More than 350 other species rely on a healthy sagebrush habitat, including elk, mule deer, pronghorn and golden eagles.  Greater sage-grouse habitat currently covers 165 million acres across 11 states in the West, representing a loss of 56 percent of the species’ historic range.  At one time, the greater sage-grouse population likely numbered in the millions, but is estimated to have dwindled to 200,000 to 500,000 birds range-wide.

BLM Resource Management Plans guide future land management actions and subsequent site-specific implementation decisions. These decisions establish the desired outcomes of resource management and the measures needed to achieve these goals and objectives.  Forest Service Land and Resource Management Plans guide all natural resource management activities and establishes management standards and guidelines for a National Forest. They describe resource management practices, levels of resource production and management, and the availability and suitability of lands for different types of resource management.

The final EIS incorporates Resource Management Plan Revisions for the Alturas, Bruneau, Eagle Lake, Jarbidge and Surprise Field Offices, and the Battle Mountain, Carson City, Elko, Ely and Winnemucca District Offices. The BLM worked with cooperating agencies and the States of Nevada and California to develop the range of alternatives analyzed and to develop the final EIS.

The Nevada and Northeastern California proposed Plan Amendment/FEIS is available at the BLM Nevada State Office and on the project website:www.blm.gov/sagegrouse.

Any person who participated in the planning process for the proposed plan and has an interest which is or may be adversely affected by a plan, may protest approval of the proposed plan during the 30-day protest period.  The protest period runs through June 29, 2015. Submit protest issues using the following methods:

Regular Mail:                                      Overnight Delivery:

BLM Director (210)                            BLM Director (210)

Attention:  Protest Coordinator          Attention:  Protest Coordinator

P.O. Box 71383                                  20 M Street SE, Room 2134LM

Washington, D.C.  20024-1383          Washington, D.C.  20003

The BLM manages more than 245 million acres of public land, the most of any Federal agency. This land, known as the National System of Public Lands, is primarily located in 12 Western states, including Alaska. The BLM also administers 700 million acres of sub-surface mineral estate throughout the nation. The BLM’s mission is to manage and conserve the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations under our mandate of multiple-use and sustained yield. In Fiscal Year 2014, the BLM generated $5.2 billion in receipts from public lands.

Comments

  1. johninnv says:

    Cresent Hardy continues to parrot his friend and neighbor Cliven Bundy. Reading and understanding facts is not a strong point for either of them. His statement “Washington should stop telling us what to do with our land and leave it to the states” just continues the “sovereign citizen” (ranked as the #1 terrorism threat to the US) ideology. News Flash Congressman hardy – the LAND in question is owned by the people of the United States…..and always has been since it was deeded from Mexico! The “locals” attempts to steal land for their own use and profits from the American People is misguided and would only serve to restrict access and use by the majority of “we the people”.

    • I do not understand all the details… However, I stand for local community’s! This Administration is corrupt and i will not let my children suffer from over powering international corporate contract makers that use the land as a Bargaining tool of the elements to strengthen their relationship overseas in the name of conserving.

Speak Your Mind

*